Trusted Tester ACT Implementation
Consistent | Partially consistent | |
---|---|---|
WCAG 2 rules | 2 | 0 |
Proposed rules | 12 | 4 |
Implemented Rules
About Trusted Tester Results
Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by US federal government. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.
Implementation Details
HTML page has lang attribute
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
3.1.1-page-language-defined
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page has lang attribute
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 14 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
3.1.1-page-language-defined | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 1 * | passed |
Failed Example 1 * | failed |
Failed Example 2 * | failed |
Failed Example 3 * | failed |
Failed Example 4 * | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 * | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 * | inapplicable |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
HTML page has non-empty title
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.4.2-page-title-defined
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page has non-empty title
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 11 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.4.2-page-title-defined | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Audio element content has text alternative
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
1.2.1-audio-transcript-text
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Audio element content has text alternative
proposed rule.
It covers all 8 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
1.2.1-audio-transcript-text | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Audio element content has transcript
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
1.2.1-audio-transcript-text
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Audio element content has transcript
proposed rule.
It covers 10 of the 11 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
1.2.1-audio-transcript-text | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.2.2-auto-updating
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden
proposed rule.
It covers all 11 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.2.2-auto-updating | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
HTML element language subtag matches language
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
3.1.2-part-language-defined
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML element language subtag matches language
proposed rule.
It covers all 14 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
3.1.2-part-language-defined | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Focusable element has no keyboard trap
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Focusable element has no keyboard trap
proposed rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation
proposed rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | passed |
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Form field label is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.4.6-label-descriptive
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Form field label is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers all 14 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.4.6-label-descriptive | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Heading is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.4.6-heading-purpose
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Heading is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers all 14 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.4.6-heading-purpose | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
HTML page title is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.4.2-page-title-purpose
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page title is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.4.2-page-title-purpose | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Image accessible name is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
1.1.1-meaningful-image-name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Image accessible name is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
1.1.1-meaningful-image-name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable |
HTML images contain no text
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
1.4.5-image-of-text
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML images contain no text
proposed rule.
It covers all 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
1.4.5-image-of-text | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Link in context is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
5effbb-test
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Link in context is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers all 18 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
5effbb-test | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
update needed
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 8 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
update needed | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
2.4.7-focus-visible
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
proposed rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
2.4.7-focus-visible | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Video element auditory content has captions
This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the
1.2.2-captions-equivalent
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Video element auditory content has captions
proposed rule.
It covers all 8 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
1.2.2-captions-equivalent | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |